<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disqualify Sotomayor Because She Is Gay.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theloudtalker.com/2009/05/sotomayor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theloudtalker.com/2009/05/sotomayor/</link>
	<description>Emotion is the enemy of critical thought.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:45:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://theloudtalker.com/2009/05/sotomayor/comment-page-1/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theloudtalker.com/?p=886#comment-347</guid>
		<description>Who cares if she&#039;s gay? It doesn&#039;t matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares if she&#8217;s gay? It doesn&#8217;t matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sotomayor Gay? Who Cares? &#171; Cinie&#8217;s World</title>
		<link>http://theloudtalker.com/2009/05/sotomayor/comment-page-1/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>Sotomayor Gay? Who Cares? &#171; Cinie&#8217;s World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 11:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theloudtalker.com/?p=886#comment-346</guid>
		<description>[...] the drawer, or a bitchy bully, or a reverse racist seems mild in comparison to the current &#8220;is she a Lesbian?&#8221; nonsense.  So what?  Even if she is, what the hell difference does it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the drawer, or a bitchy bully, or a reverse racist seems mild in comparison to the current &#8220;is she a Lesbian?&#8221; nonsense.  So what?  Even if she is, what the hell difference does it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cann0nba11</title>
		<link>http://theloudtalker.com/2009/05/sotomayor/comment-page-1/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>cann0nba11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 21:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theloudtalker.com/?p=886#comment-345</guid>
		<description>THanks for visiting INformed.

Which of Terry&#039;s characterizations of Obama do you disagree with? He had n o relevant experience prior to getting this job, his entire career has consisted of college and running for election. He may be intelligent, but he is intellectually stunted (has a flawed understanding of history and economics, two vital concpets for a president). As to con artist and fraud, he utilized many fraudulent and/or dishonest techniques during the campaign and for fund-raising.

Please clarify.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THanks for visiting INformed.</p>
<p>Which of Terry&#8217;s characterizations of Obama do you disagree with? He had n o relevant experience prior to getting this job, his entire career has consisted of college and running for election. He may be intelligent, but he is intellectually stunted (has a flawed understanding of history and economics, two vital concpets for a president). As to con artist and fraud, he utilized many fraudulent and/or dishonest techniques during the campaign and for fund-raising.</p>
<p>Please clarify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iNformed</title>
		<link>http://theloudtalker.com/2009/05/sotomayor/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>iNformed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 17:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theloudtalker.com/?p=886#comment-344</guid>
		<description>Wow. I strongly agree with your first sentence. Sotomayor&#039;s sexual preferences shouldn&#039;t be an issue. Though, you refer to Obama as &quot;unqualified,&quot; &quot;intellectually limited,&quot; a &quot;con artist,&quot; and a &quot;fraud?&quot; Someone is a bit ignorant when it comes to their president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I strongly agree with your first sentence. Sotomayor&#8217;s sexual preferences shouldn&#8217;t be an issue. Though, you refer to Obama as &#8220;unqualified,&#8221; &#8220;intellectually limited,&#8221; a &#8220;con artist,&#8221; and a &#8220;fraud?&#8221; Someone is a bit ignorant when it comes to their president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cann0nba11</title>
		<link>http://theloudtalker.com/2009/05/sotomayor/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>cann0nba11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 05:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theloudtalker.com/?p=886#comment-343</guid>
		<description>Well said Terry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Terry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

