http://theloudtalker.com/2009/08/hr-675-wheres-the-aclu/ Emotion is the enemy of critical thought. Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:45:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://theloudtalker.com/2009/08/hr-675-wheres-the-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-1559 Ric Thomas Fri, 18 Jun 2010 23:44:26 +0000 http://theloudtalker.com/?p=1242#comment-1559 Wow.....can i get someone out there who can just read the bill for what it is....every police officer in the counrty has a similar statue. Allow me to clear up some concerns that individuals such as yourself have. HR 675 is for DOD 0083 series civillian law enforcement officers only...NOT MILITARY POLICE! This bill gives those law enforcement officers who protect and serve these DOD installations the same statutory authority as any other civillian or federal law enforcement officer...nothing more or nothing less. This bill does not give a DOD police officer the authority to create there own on the spot arrest warrant....to even suggest that is very funny....FYI a warrant is only valid when a member from the judicial branch (Judge or Commissioner) has signed it. This bill gives the DOD police officer statutory authority only within their area of responsibility or jurisdiction. I do believe that those DOD officers who put there life on the line daily...no different from any other police officer in the counrty should have the same statutory authority. Those DOD police officers at Ft Hood are good enough to stop an assailant and get shot in the process but not good enough to have the same statutory authority....tell me whats wrong with that picture. No one said anything when NCIS got their statutory authority....they still have to go to a judge to obtain an arrest warrant....Hope this clears up some of your concerns. Wow…..can i get someone out there who can just read the bill for what it is….every police officer in the counrty has a similar statue. Allow me to clear up some concerns that individuals such as yourself have. HR 675 is for DOD 0083 series civillian law enforcement officers only…NOT MILITARY POLICE! This bill gives those law enforcement officers who protect and serve these DOD installations the same statutory authority as any other civillian or federal law enforcement officer…nothing more or nothing less. This bill does not give a DOD police officer the authority to create there own on the spot arrest warrant….to even suggest that is very funny….FYI a warrant is only valid when a member from the judicial branch (Judge or Commissioner) has signed it. This bill gives the DOD police officer statutory authority only within their area of responsibility or jurisdiction. I do believe that those DOD officers who put there life on the line daily…no different from any other police officer in the counrty should have the same statutory authority. Those DOD police officers at Ft Hood are good enough to stop an assailant and get shot in the process but not good enough to have the same statutory authority….tell me whats wrong with that picture. No one said anything when NCIS got their statutory authority….they still have to go to a judge to obtain an arrest warrant….Hope this clears up some of your concerns.

]]> http://theloudtalker.com/2009/08/hr-675-wheres-the-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-1465 Joshua Wed, 26 May 2010 02:53:35 +0000 http://theloudtalker.com/?p=1242#comment-1465 When i see opinions such as yours i just keep going without leaving a comment. However i do want to clear something up for you, when the bill states to arrest without a warrant, what it is referring to (which by the way is the same as every police officer in the country) is if a dod police officer sees a crime happening such as shop lifting, d.w.i. and etc. then they can make an arrest. Im sure you really want to believe this, but its not true and its people like you that make it hard for this bill to pass. I am a dod police officer and this bill is to give us statue of arrest on gov. property only. just like anyone else outside of our jurdiction we would not have such athorthy. Also i have apperhended over a hundred civilians in the last year and most, if not all were charged with that offense and proscuted. my question for you is did you even read it before you copied and paste? it says and i will c and p: make an arrest without a warrant for any offense committed in the presence of the officer. where does it say search warrant. try researching before you start writing b.s. next time. any questions just email me and ill be sure that you have the right information. When i see opinions such as yours i just keep going without leaving a comment. However i do want to clear something up for you, when the bill states to arrest without a warrant, what it is referring to (which by the way is the same as every police officer in the country) is if a dod police officer sees a crime happening such as shop lifting, d.w.i. and etc. then they can make an arrest. Im sure you really want to believe this, but its not true and its people like you that make it hard for this bill to pass. I am a dod police officer and this bill is to give us statue of arrest on gov. property only. just like anyone else outside of our jurdiction we would not have such athorthy. Also i have apperhended over a hundred civilians in the last year and most, if not all were charged with that offense and proscuted. my question for you is did you even read it before you copied and paste? it says and i will c and p: make an arrest without a warrant for any offense committed in the presence of the officer. where does it say search warrant. try researching before you start writing b.s. next time. any questions just email me and ill be sure that you have the right information.

]]>