The nobel is standardly given to individuals committed to treason against their countries. Obama got this award for his pandering to the U.N. and other international organizations who love nothing more than to trample for the sovereignty of nations.

Obama is even sympathetic to the U.N.’s aspirations to disarm American citizens. That’s even to incorporated into a game I found earlier last week called “2011: Obama’s Coup Fails”, you can google it, it a military strategy game based in 2011 and Obama’s attempted to dissolve the Constitution of the United States with the NAU and he’s signed a U.N. treaty into law banning the private ownership of firearms.

The cogitation that citizens being armed is over all “dangerous” is common all throughout the media as well. Even with these commercials I’ve been seeing for some new T.V. show on Alaskan State Troopers, part of the advert describing the dangers are “Backup is hours away, every citizen is armed, blahblah polar bears.” Wait a second… Every citizen being armed makes YOUR JOB EASIER.

What, would disarming citizens somehow make it safer for citizens or state troopers? If your “back up” is hours away then can’t that mean that HELP for any citizens could ALSO be hours away? Individuals are charged with their own self defense, I’d rather have a gun to defend myself against a wild animal or a criminal instead of my cell phone and the state trooper that’s three hours away from me.

I think that the committee was premature in offering the Nobel to Obama. While he IS in a position to do something, so have many past presidents and other world leaders. I think it is best to give him time to let his policies come to fruition before awarding him such a prestigious honor. Intent is not worthy of this award. (in my opinion)

Read this article here, Reuters does a good job of explaining it (note this article was written before the prize was even awarded).

http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSL7572564

By the criteria in the article, it’s easy to see how Obama could be a very attractive candidate for the prize. Remember, the “Nobel Peace Prize”, is the only Nobel prize that does not need to be awarded for any past accomplishment(s). It can be used as vehicle to promote peace for someone who is currently engaged in a peace making process.