“As I see it, the problem with the [act] is that it expands police powers generally, beyond the implicit limits of the Bill of Rights, and does not limit itself to nor require any measurable success against terrorism.” (source)
“This continuous evasion of judicial review by the administration is much more serious and disturbing than has been discussed and realized… The attribute which most singularly defines this administration is its insistence that our Government is based on unilateral and unreviewed Presidential Decree.” (source)
To me these sound like direct attacks on Team Obama. Expanding presidential powers without checks and balances, evading judicial review, and so on. Doing so is in direct conflict with our constitution and bill of rights. Sounds like the shoe fits, right?
Well, only if you are a liberal. The two quotes above are actually criticisms of the Bush Administration and the Patriot Act. They were screaming about the warrantless wiretapping of potential terrorists after the worst attack on our country ever. Now, as the Great Uniter continues to lie and to mislead Americans every day the left is suddenly eerily quiet about warrantless activities.
Back in January, during the drunken stupor following the election of the Messiah’s historic inauguration, Representative Bob Filner (D-CA) proposed H.R. 675. What is it’s goal?
To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide police officers, criminal investigators, and game law enforcement officers of the Department of Defense with authority to execute warrants, make arrests, and carry firearms.
Furthermore,
Allows the Secretary of Defense to authorize a Department of Defense (DOD) law enforcement officer to:
(1) execute and serve a warrant or other process;
(2) make an arrest without a warrant for any offense committed in the presence of the officer, or for any felony if the officer has probable cause to believe that the person arrested has committed or is committing the felony; and
(3) carry firearms.“Sec. 1585b. Law enforcement officers of the Department of Defense: authority to execute warrants, make arrests, and carry firearms… for any offense against the United States.”
Hm. Are those “offenses against the United States” defined anywhere? Nope. Is it possible that police could use their subjective discretion to determine what is an offense against the United States? What about civilians?
Wake up America! This bill gives a variety of law enforcement officials the ability to generate a search warrant ON THE SPOT and then execute that search warrant. No judicial review. No checks and balances. For crying out loud, under George Bush we were not allowed to profile at airports for Muslim terrorists that want to kill us. Now, under the Great Communicator we are willing to give law enforcement officers the right to generate their own warrants? Yeah, that sounds like a great idea. There’s no chance that this power will be abused whatsoever, right?
Why isn’t the press talking about this? Why did they cover ad nauseum all of the strife and angst from the Left over warrantless wiretaps used to protect America from terrorists? Where is the ACLU on this obvious infringement of our privacy? My guess is that they are busy trying to find the next great scoop on our evil CIA and its varied interrogation techniques. Or maybe they are busy drooling over the new cast of “Dancing With The Stars.”
Hat tip to One Penny Sheet.
Carrie Prejean, a.k.a. Miss California 20o9, is being blasted by the left for her polite on-the-spot answer saying that she believes marriage is between a man and a woman. Perez Hilton, the flamboyantly gay Miss USA judge that asked this entirely inappropriate question and started the firestorm, called Prejean a “dumb bitch” in his video blog tirade after the pageant and has yet to receive any negative press. Miss CA may lose her title over expressing her opinion.
Funny thing: her opinion on this issue is the same as that of President Obama. Why didn’t the left explode over the issue then? Because they are nothing but a bunch of hypocritical jack-asses that care more about hearing their own heads rattle than they do about the issues. The double-standard and wanton hypocrisy is mind boggling.
Remember when Liberals cared about Free Speech? Isnt this supposed to be the inclusive party of diverse thought (according to Nancy Pelosi)? Why isn’t the ACLU defending Ms. Pregean’s constitutional right to free speech? Why isn’t her public humiliation by the left-leaning media justification for a hate crime? After all, she is being lambasted for stating her opinion, one that the gay community disagrees with. (again, forget about the fact that most politicians and most of America for that matter are against gay marriage).
Those that are screaming about this are doing more damage to their cause than their tiny, bigotted little brains can comprehend. I welcome their political vapaidity with open arms and encourage them to continue this gay parade of false rage. If news like this continues to saturate the airwaves 2010 will be a conservative landslide.
