It seems that so many liberals have a serious memory disorder. Lately we have been hearing criticism of conservative angst and the frustration on display at town halls all across America. Liberals are simply shocked at such rude, horrific, hateful behavior. Nancy Pelosi dropped a Nazi reference while in Arkansas, and I would be dollars to doughnuts that anything resembling a swastika was planted by an SEIU or Acorn racist piece of crap thug. After all, it’s straight out of the Alinsky handbook. “No way,” our moderate and liberal friends, say. That’s just tinfoil hat talk. Sorry, but that’s the truth. Saul Alinsky was asked by college students at Tulane how to protest George HW Bush in 1972. He told them that instead of shouting Bush down, they should:

“go to hear the speech dressed as members of the Ku Klux Klan, and whenever Bush said something in defense of the Vietnam War, they should cheer and wave placards reading, ‘The KKK supports Bush.’  And that is what they did, with very successful, attention-getting results.”

I am quite confident that this tactic is in play today.

So, as a reminder to the supposed high-road liberals out there, dissent is still patriotic, even when the opinions shouted are opposite of your own views.Here are some examples of the class liberals showed during the last eight years.


I’m really getting tired of hypocritical liberals telling me that my expression of free speech is offensive. I find political correctness offensive. I find Nancy Pelosi’s lies offensive. I find Joe Biden’s gaffes offensive. I find Barack Obama’s flip flopping and misleading offensive. I am waiting for the return of the days when free speech was supported by all Americans, especially liberals.

“Liberals can understand everything but people who don’t understand them.” Lenny Bruce

Spread the word!
  • RSS
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • Add to favorites
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
Tagged with:
 

My Take On Birthers

On August 10, 2009, in Election, Free Speech, Obama, Politics, media, by Paulie

Birther, birther, birther, birther, birther. I’m growing tired of hearing about the dispute over Obama’s lacking birth certificate. Not because I think the argument has no merit, but because the left is using coverage of all things “birther” to distract Americans from the real, serious issues that we are facing today. It’s today’s version of “I can see Russia from my house” (a statement that Sarah Palin never said, but is believe to have been said by millions of clueless voters).

My take: Obama’s mother was a flake. She had a thing for foreigners, she married and divorved twice, and moved around quite a bit including going overseas. My money is on the fact that she probably lost his original birth certificate, making it impossible for the president to prove anything about his birth via original documentation.

However, rules exist for a reason. Obama should have had to prove his eligibility, otherwise the concept of rules and requirements becomes moot. I am still waiting for any liberal to justify why Obama had his records in Hawaii sealed. If there is no problem, he would share the records and all of this birther talk would go away. What could justify the hiding of his documents? What’s in there that we will probably never see? If I were insanely rich I would offer one million dollars to anyone that could give me a reasonable explanation justifying Obama’s secrecy. I think my money would be safe.

How bout this: I’ll give out a rare and valuable RFC Radio sticker to anyone that can explain Obama’s lack of transparency on this issue. ;-)

Spread the word!
  • RSS
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • Add to favorites
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
Tagged with:
 

Once again the idiots, and I do mean idiots, on the left are exposing their inner dimensia. Libs are freaking out over the Obama Joker poster. According to the article “Los Angeles Urban Policy Roundtable President Earl Ofari Hutchinson is calling the depiction, politically mean spirited and dangerous.” Personally, I tend to be wary toward any organization that has the word “urban” in it’s name. I would like to tell Mr. Hutchinson to shut the hell up. Stick your mean spirited worries straight up your patootie. You are a clueless, biased ignoramus.

While I would love to have all of the free time in the world to research idiots like this, I am one of those radical neo-con freaks that has this thing called a job. Therefore I am forced to make the educated assumption that Hutchinson didn’t have much to say about the following pictures. Please, can someone find me liberal feedback that considers these pictures offensive? I bet huffpo, media matters and kos had the proverbial chills going up there legs each time the pictures below were released. I am 100% for free speech. But I am also 100% for rational, educated, logical free speech. Cut the double standard crap. We have every right to criticise the president whether it be in words or with Photoshop. In other words: sometimes a monkey is just a monkey.

Spread the word!
  • RSS
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • Add to favorites
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
Tagged with:
 

Carrie Prejean, a.k.a. Miss California 20o9, is being blasted by the left for her polite on-the-spot answer saying that she believes marriage is between a man and a woman. Perez Hilton, the flamboyantly gay Miss USA judge that asked this entirely inappropriate question and started the firestorm, called Prejean a “dumb bitch” in his video blog tirade after the pageant and has yet to receive any negative press. Miss CA may lose her title over expressing her opinion.

Funny thing: her opinion on this issue is the same as that of President Obama. Why didn’t the left explode over the issue then? Because they are nothing but a bunch of hypocritical jack-asses that care more about hearing their own heads rattle than they do about the issues. The double-standard and wanton hypocrisy is mind boggling.

Remember when Liberals cared about Free Speech? Isnt this supposed to be the inclusive party of diverse thought (according to Nancy Pelosi)? Why isn’t the ACLU defending Ms. Pregean’s constitutional right to free speech? Why isn’t her public humiliation by the left-leaning media justification for a hate crime? After all, she is being lambasted for stating her opinion, one that the gay community disagrees with. (again, forget about the fact that most politicians and most of America for that matter are against gay marriage).

Those that are screaming about this are doing more damage to their cause than their tiny, bigotted little brains can comprehend. I welcome their political vapaidity with open arms and encourage them to continue this gay parade of false rage. If news like this continues to saturate the airwaves 2010 will be a conservative landslide.

Spread the word!
  • RSS
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • Add to favorites
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
Tagged with: