Should Steele Resign?

On July 7, 2010, in Politics, Terrorism, War, by Paulie

Two words: Hell no.

I know, I know. I’m in the minorty among my conservative friends but hear me out. Michael Steele is a modest Republican version of Joe Biden, with an equally charming smile plus the un-Biden-like trait of being man enough to embrace his own baldness.

What will happen if Michael Steele steps down or is somehow forcibly removed? The left will swarm like kids around the ice cream man and the complicit press will force feed the news to Americans from every channel ad nauseum.

What would happen if Michael Steele stays put, as I think he should? The press will swarm like kids around the ice cream man and the complicit press will force feed the news to Americans from every channel ad nauseum.

So why give the left another grave to dance over? The left will do what it does regardless of what Mr. Steele decides to do. Remember, Steele’s term ends in January, 2011. Why not focus on important things like winning local elections and generating conservative voter activity in November? Sure, what Mr. Steele said about Afghanistan didn’t make sense. I think he misspoke, the same way that Al Gore misspoke about inventing the internet.

Is Steele right that a land war in Afghanistan is a bad idea? Why not ask Russia for the answer.

Is he right that this war is of Obama’s choosing? Yes and no. We all know the war started nine years ago, so it is obviously not of Obama’s creation. But it is the war that Obama has repeatedly expressed support for. I think it is his war, just not of his making.

Does his statement merit loss of his job? Again I say hell no. If politicians lost their jobs over erroneous or questionable statements they made during various gatherings the House, Senate and White House would be empty. But if you think he should step down, I suggest you ask President Obama step down for any of the dozens of verbal and factual, um, “gaffes” he has made. Given that Steele was speaking at a fund raiser, let’s just pull one Obama gaffe out of the air for comparison. It had to do with people clinging to their guns and their religion. One man was asked to resign, the other was elected president.

When you convince me of the logic of those outcomes I might consider joining the emotional “fire Steele” bandwagon. I just think we need to focus on the bigger picture: We have a country to save.

Spread the word!
  • RSS
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • Add to favorites
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
Tagged with:
 

If president Obama removes General Stanley McChrystal from his role as leader of our efforts in Afghanistan, it will be the first time an active duty general has been removed from leading his troops during a war since Macarthur was relieved in Korean War. Given that perspective, you would think that McChrystal did something really bad.

::crickets::

I think those that condemn the general are failing to “read the bill” again. I think our president may be acting stupidly (again). As I type this General Stanley McChrystal is rumored to have submitted his resignation to the president. Say it ain’t so Stan.

  • Sen. John Thune, R-SD, said, “Things that were said in the article…were inappropriate. They’re inconsistent with the protocol and the chain of command in the military.”
  • Committee Chairman Carl Levin, D-MI, said he is “very troubled by (McChrystal’s) comments.”
  • Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, D-FL, said questions about McChrystal’s future are “above my pay grade.”
  • Republican John McCain of Arizona, Joe Lieberman, I-CT, and Lindsey Graham, R-SC: “We have the highest respect for General McChrystal and honor his brave service and sacrifice to our nation. General McChrystal’s comments, as reported in Rolling Stone, are inappropriate and inconsistent with the traditional relationship between Commander-in-Chief and the military.”

I’ve read the entire Rolling Stone article that has Washington all in a tizzy. Personally I think Rolling Stone contains a lot of crap intended for today’s MTV reality television audience.  It would be refreshing to read an article that doesn’t have an f-bomb in every paragraph, although I agree with the following excerpt:

“When it comes to Afghanistan, history is not on McChrystal’s side. The only foreign invader to have any success here was Genghis Khan – and he wasn’t hampered by things like human rights, economic development and press scrutiny.”

To save you some time I’ve captured every single quote attributed directly to General McChrystal and listed them below. The most shocking statements that I’m seeing repeated in the press come from aides or other military personnel, not General McCrystal. After you read the list, please let me know which of the quotes below merits removing a sitting general from his leadership role in the middle of a war.

I think McChrystal’s biggest mistake was agreeing to let Rolling Stone shadow him and write a story in the first place. What was he thinking? Was he taking a cue from the rock star president that he voted for and that gave him his job in the first place? Washington Post columnist Jackson Diehl wrote, “McChrystal may be at fault for expressing his frustrations to Rolling Stone. He is not at fault for the lack of coherence in the Afghan campaign or the continued feuding over strategy. That is Obama’s responsibility.”

I am against removing General McChrystal and I hope that he does not resign. One of the many articles I’ve read about this suggested that it would be a win-win for Obama to reject the generals resignation letter. I can easily see that happening. After all, Obama is a politician, not a leader. As Ed Morrissey sums up nicely: “…until [Obama] starts acting like an actual Commander in Chief with his own team, McChrystal isn’t the real problem.”

Here is the list of McChrystal quotes. Judge for yourself and let me know if any of the statements below are worthy of taking down a general.McChrystal Quotes from the Rolling Stone Article:

  • ‘How’d I get screwed into going to this dinner?”
  • “Hey, Charlie,” he asks, “does this come with the position?”
  • “What’s the update on the Kandahar bombing?”
  • “I’d rather have my ass kicked by a roomful of people than go out to this dinner. Unfortunately no one in this room could do it.”
  • “shortsighted,” “Chaos-istan.”
  • “I never know what’s going to pop out until I’m up there, that’s the problem.” “Are you asking about Vice President Biden?” “Who’s that?”
  • After arriving in Afghanistan last June, the general conducted his own policy review, ordered up by Defense Secretary Robert Gates. The now-infamous report was leaked to the press, and its conclusion was dire: If we didn’t send another 40,000 troops – swelling the number of U.S. forces in Afghanistan by nearly half – we were in danger of “mission failure.”
  • Obama launched a three-month review to re-evaluate the strategy in Afghanistan. “I found that time painful,” McChrystal tells me in one of several lengthy interviews. “I was selling an unsellable position.”
  • The biggest military operation of the year – a ferocious offensive that began in February to retake the southern town of Marja – continues to drag on, prompting McChrystal himself to refer to it as a “bleeding ulcer.”
  • “All these men,” he tells me. “I’d die for them. And they’d die for me.”
  • “Oh, not another e-mail from Holbrooke,” he groans. “I don’t even want to open it.”
  • McChrystal and his team were blindsided by the cable. “I like Karl, I’ve known him for years, but they’d never said anything like that to us before,” says McChrystal, who adds that he felt “betrayed” by the leak. “Here’s one that covers his flank for the history books. Now if we fail, they can say, ‘I told you so.’ ”
  • Stanley McChrystal entered an Army that was all but broken in the wake of Vietnam. “We really felt we were a peacetime generation,” he recalls. “There was the Gulf War, but even that didn’t feel like that big of a deal.”
  • 2004 “If the circumstances of Corporal Tillman’s death become public,” he wrote, it could cause “public embarrassment” for the president.
  • “I’m saddened by the accusation that I don’t care about soldiers, as it is something I suspect any soldier takes both personally and professionally – at least I do. But I know perceptions depend upon your perspective at the time, and I respect that every soldier’s view is his own.”
  • The general has a 45-minute discussion with some two dozen soldiers. The atmosphere is tense. “I ask you what’s going on in your world, and I think it’s important for you all to understand the big picture as well,” McChrystal begins. “How’s the company doing? You guys feeling sorry for yourselves? Anybody? Anybody feel like you’re losing?”
  • “Strength is leading when you just don’t want to lead,” he tells the men. “You’re leading by example. That’s what we do. Particularly when it’s really, really hard, and it hurts inside.”
  • “We are knee-deep in the decisive year.” “This is the philosophical part that works with think tanks,” McChrystal tries to joke. “But it doesn’t get the same reception from infantry companies.”
  • “Winning hearts and minds in COIN is a coldblooded thing. The Russians killed 1 million Afghans, and that didn’t work.”
  • “I agree with you. In this area, we’ve not made progress, probably. You have to show strength here, you have to use fire. What I’m telling you is, fire costs you. What do you want to do? You want to wipe the population out here and resettle it?”
  • “That’s the way this game is,” “It’s complex. I can’t just decide: It’s shirts and skins, and we’ll kill all the shirts.”
  • “There’s no way I can make that easier,” he tells them. “No way I can pretend it won’t hurt. No way I can tell you not to feel that… I will tell you, you’re doing a great job. Don’t let the frustration get to you.”
  • “Even Afghans are confused by Afghanistan.”

Maybe it’s just me, but I see nothing wrong with the quotes above.

Spread the word!
  • RSS
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • Add to favorites
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
Tagged with:
 

Podcast – April 22, 2010:

On April 22, 2010, in 2010, Obama, Politics, Texas, podcast, by Paulie

It’s Earth Day! ::yawn:: Southpark, Golf and an interview with Ted Cruz, probably the next governor of Texas.

Spread the word!
  • RSS
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • Add to favorites
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
Tagged with:
 

I’d like to say a few things about this video and its value to us as parents. On the surface its presentation and tone are friendly and it is easy to believe that it is a well-researched mini documentary, but that’s the scary part. It IS well presented, but it’s mission is not to inform, it is to persuade. It is a blatant attempt to mislead and actually lie to our childre; this video should NOT be in our schools, unless an opposing viewpoint is offered for equal time.

The video came out last year, and that far right-wing network CNN (sarc) did a short segment on it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vTJdpbUYhY

The “Story of Stuff” video portrays America and corporations in general as bad, a concept that I wholeheartedly disagree with. Leonard complains about “stuff” but fails to talk about how the manufacture, sale and consumption of “stuff” has helped make America the greatest nation on Earth.

For starters, Annie Leonard is the host. As with any presentation the audience should know what the speaker’s credentials are and why we should be listening to her. Leonard has worked for some of the most liberally oriented organizations in America.

  • Greenpeace International – Far left environmental activist group, its history and violence is well-documented.
  • GAIA – A Dutch group who’s vision is stated in its web site: “for all people to live in settlements containing all elements of society much like a holograph, where every part contains the whole.” It is anti-corporation, but interestingly enough, GAIA is funded through a massive hedge fund based on currency trading.
  • Health Care Without Harm – The Tides Foundation is one of its many funders. HCWH has “a vision of a health care sector that does no harm, and instead promotes the health of people and the environment. To that end, we are working to implement ecologically sound and healthy alternatives to health care practices that pollute the environment and contribute to disease.” This sounds great, but the group is quite liberally biased.
  • Global Greengrants. This group is a non-profit that provides grants to green projects and activists. Its board treasurer works for George Soros’ Tides Foundation, its board chair runs the Tobacco Free Project based in San Francisco.
  • Essential Information – Founded in 1982 by Ralph Nader, Essential Information is a non-profit, tax-exempt organization. Very anti-corporation, anti-industry.

Based on her resume Annie Leonard is what most people would consider biased. As to the facts and errors in the video, it has been thoroughly explained and debunked. These videos are worth watching more than once.

If you lack the time or attention span to watch the four videos above I’ve provided a small sample of the problems that lie within. Keep in mind that the following five errors appear in just the first three minutes of the video.  The italicized statements are from the video verbatum, you can also download the script with footnotes in PDF format.

1) “Now my friends tell me I should use a tank to symbolize the government and that’s true in many countries and increasingly in our own, after all more than 50% of our federal tax money is now going to the military”
The source of this statement is the “War Resisters League.” Obviously they are biased enough, but the math is just horrible. To reach this conclusion they removed Medicare, Medicade and Social Security costs from the equation to inflate its number. Why? Because it serves their purpose of persuasion. By the way, the Congressional Budget Office confirms that military spending consumes 20%, not 50% of tax dollars. That’s a BIG difference.

2) “It’s the government’s job is to watch out for us, to take care of us. That’s their job.”
This is a very liberal interpretation of the PreAmble to the Constitution.  The government exists to protect us from invasion, to handle foreign trade, and that’s about it. The STATES have more rights. The state is NOT our parent, our teacher or our baby-sitter. We get Life, Liberty and the PURSUIT of Happiness, not the GUARANTEE of happiness.

3) “Of the 100 largest economies on earth now, 51 are corporations”
Source: IPS, which acknowledges that it operates as a training center for radical organizers. This is a radically left anti-corporation organization. It is based on sales revenue, not profits. It is meaningless. Yes, Exxon/Mobile sells more product than the entire country of Chad. So what? This is just more anti-corporation rhetoric.

4) “we’ve seen a little change in the government where they’re a little more concerned in making sure everything is working out for [corporations] than for us.”
Again, more liberal anti-capitalism bias. The video shows the government shining the shoes of fat corporations. She completely ignores the influence of unions, lawyers and environmental activists on corporate behavior.

5) “In the past three decades alone, one-third of the planet’s natural resources base have been consumed. Gone.”
100% false. Pure liberal bias based on a book by environmental activists. It cannot be proved because it is a useless statement. As one of the videos above says, land with oil underneath it was useless until we discovered oil and learned how to use oil. Resources are replaceable.

I could go on but I think I’ve made my point. This well-produced video — funded by some of the most liberal, anti-American, anti-capitalism groups in existence — has done damage that we as involved parents need to correct. I shudder to think how many parents are not aware of this and how many millions of minds have been falsely persuaded toward this liberal eco/green way of thinking.

Spread the word!
  • RSS
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • Add to favorites
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
Tagged with:
 

Our National Priorities?

On March 22, 2010, in 2010, 2012, Crime, Obama, Politics, liberals, tea party, by Paulie

Here’s how I feel today. Feel free to borrow, link to, distribute or share the image below that I just created. Open source baby, spread the word.

Spread the word!
  • RSS
  • Slashdot
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • Add to favorites
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
Tagged with: