Stimulus Shmimulus

On May 14, 2009, in Economy, by TheLoudTalker

This graph tells us what most rational people already knew about the Stimulus. IT WASN’T NECESSARY. Billions of dollars, OUR dollars, were thrown down an obvious drain.

Tagged with:
 

Video: Obama's Negative Effect on US Companies

On May 11, 2009, in Politics, by TheLoudTalker

Any conversation about taxes is dry and sometimes painful to endure. But when the future of America is at risk, specifically the future of American companies and their ability to survive and provide jobs, you are obligated to understand the situation and learn how to protect yourself and America.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTXiadVpS4M]

The US has the world’s second most punitive taxing scheme. Obama’s misguided policy will reduce exports from America and reduce jobs in America. For more information go here: http://www.freedomandprosperity.org.

Tagged with:
 

Get real Democrats. Draft a STIMULUS plan, not a wish list!

On February 13, 2009, in Economy, by TheLoudTalker

Congress wants to vote on a more than thousand page bill that was handed over late last night. Assuming it will take one-minute per page to read, it will take more than 15 HOURS to go through the bill page by page. Yet we are told to trust that Congress is doing the right thing by voting today?

Here are some of the items in the bill:

  • $100 million for the Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control Grant Program
  • $200 million to the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund Program
  • $300 million for “Violence Against Women Prevention and Prosecution Programs”
  • $900 million for the IRS for the “Limitation on Administrative Expenses”
  • $1 million for the Railroad Retirement Board for administrative costs
  • $2 billion for the Drinking Water State Revolving Act
  • $50 million for Health and Human Services to carry out injury prevention programs
  • $1.1 billion for studies on the effectiveness of different medical treatments — $200 million to upgrade labs and facilities for the Department of Agriculture “to improve workplace safety and mission-area efficiencies”
  • $10 million for urban canal inspection
  • $16 billion to pay for student financial aid
  • $1 billion to pay for the U.S. Census
  • $600 million to pay for a fuel-efficient federal auto fleet
  • $650 million for the Digital Converter Box Program to help the constantly delayed transition from analog television
  • $485 million to the Forest Service for “hazardous fuels reduction and hazard mitigation activities in areas at high risk of catastrophic wildfire”
  • Up to $1 billion for “summer activities” for youths as old as 24
  • $40 million for the occupational research agenda
  • $3 billion for the Centers for Disease Control wellness programs and vaccinations
  • $410 million for Indian health facilities
  • $2.4 billion for carbon-capture demonstrations

This list makes up more than $30 BILLION in non-stimulus spending.  There’s plenty more in there, but the point should be clear. Democrats, following the advice of President Whisperer Rahm Emanuel, is packing this urgent bill with pet projects and payback to constituents. (Remember, he’s the Obama staffer that said “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.”) President Obama flat out lied to America earlier this week during his press conference when he said there was no pork in this bill. . (And no, hippy, Bush didn’t lie about the war. Bush AND Congress approved our military actions based on the information at hand at the time.) President Obama lied, lied, lied.

Making matters worse, Chuck Schumer had the umittigated gall to say that the “American people really don’t care” about all those “little tiny, yes, porky amendments” that the “chattering classes” have exposed. Oh, and Schumer wants to bring back the Un-Fairness Doctrine to silence the free speech flexing of the political right.

This is not a stimulus package, it is a wish list, and Nancy Pelosi should be ashamed.

Tagged with:
 

Let's talk about inheritance.

On February 11, 2009, in Politics, by TheLoudTalker

President Obama more than once took shots at the Bush administration by mentioning the mess that he has inherited. This is directly in line with the campaign mantra of “eight failed years of Bush policies” that half of America bought into. But when you look at the facts you learn that Obama is on the team that helped create the problem we are facing. This has been well documented (and equally ignored by Democrats and their pet press cronies). Despite 9/11, Bush II enjoyed a strong economy for six years. What changed? 1) Democratic control of Congress, and 2) the much anticipated burst of the housing bubble. Republicans don’t entirely own this process, in fact, Democrats own the vast majority of the responsibility. But that’s not what the President said in his first press conference this week. (for some perspective on the first presser, read this and/or this.)

“As I said, the one concern I’ve got on the stimulus package, in terms of the debate and listening to some of what’s been said in Congress is that there seems to be a set of folks who — I don’t doubt their sincerity — who just believe that we should do nothing.”

As Ed Morrissey said yesterday, Republicans in both the House and Senate have offered at least two alternative stimulus packages.  None of them demanded that Obama “do nothing”.  In fact, it was the Congressional Budget Office and not Republicans that suggested that doing nothing might have a better effect than the Obama/Pelosi/Reid stimulus bill.”

Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, among others, are in complete denial of how this crisis was created. And Team Obama campaigned on the “eight years of failed Bush policies” slogan that is frankly a bald-faced lie. In fact, according to Barron’s, “Contrary to a view popularized during the 2008 presidential election season, the current economic crisis was not the result of deregulation. The Bush administration made many mistakes, but deregulation was not one of them. Not only was there no major deregulation passed during the past eight years, but the Bush administration and a Republican Congress approved the most sweeping financial-market regulation in decades.”

Let me repeat that. “The Bush administration and a Republican Congress approved the most sweeping financial-market regulation in decades.” Even Liberal financial genius George Soros has opined on the cause of the crisis.

Consider how the crisis has unfolded over the past eighteen months. The proximate cause is to be found in the housing bubble or more exactly in the excesses of the sub-prime mortgage market. The longer a double-digit rise in house prices lasted, the more lax the lending practices became. In the end, people could borrow 100 percent of inflated house prices with no money down. Insiders referred to sub-prime loans as ninja loans—no income, no job, no questions asked.

Our economic situation was not created by “eight years of failed Bush policies.” It was not created by big oil or Dick Cheney. It was born in1977 under Jimmy Carter in the form of the CRC; it was strengthened in1995-1999 by Bill Clinton and Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin. Rubin “brokered a deal between the administration and Congress that allowed banking deregulation to move forward. Shortly after the compromise was reached, Rubin took a top position at Citigroup, which went on to embark upon mergers that would have been rendered illegal under Glass-Steagall. As the New York Times put it, Rubin would be leading “what has become the first true American financial conglomerate since the Depression”—a conglomerate that could exist only because of legislation he had just shepherded through Congress.” (source)

Our liberal friends are saying “But Bush was a de-regulator! It was the deregulation that did it man!” Wrong. GWB started raising red flags in 2001, and disclosed at a Congressional hearing in 2003 that “a new agency would have been created within the Treasury Department to assume supervision of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that are the two largest players in the mortgage lending industry.” What was the Democratic response to this suggestion? ”These two entities — Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — are not in a financial crisis,’‘ (source: see 2:25) said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee in 2003. Personally, if we can jail the CEOs of Enron and Worldcom, I think Frank should be in jail for his poitical and financial negligence. He is willfully denying the truth that has put America in a scary place.

So, I implore President Obama to stop with the scare tacticts and stop with the lies. Stop blaming the previous president for the country’s woes and start doing something about it. And I don’t mean do anything, I mean do the right thing. Swift, knee-jerk actions made under diress do not usually have positive outcomes. Slow down, think this through. And for God’s sake please include both parties in the problem solving process. Nancy Pelosi’s exclusionary leadership is in direct conflict with her campign promise of a more cooperative, collegial approach that allowed for dissent and debate. Fifty Democrats are asking for help to control the Speaker, but I don’t think it is working. Maybe a cage match between Pelosi and Obama is needed to determine who is actually leading our country?

Tagged with:
 

What would you do with $4290?

On February 6, 2009, in Economy, by TheLoudTalker
America's Financial Iceberg

America's Financial Iceberg

As Kevin McCullough noted today, “if we took the projected size of the stimulus at $1,300,000,000,000, and divided by the population at present time – individuals would get back roughly $4290 per person and the average family of four would get back a little more than $17,000.”

I think the concept of a stimulus package is a farce. Congress tried to scare us into supporting the TARP saying that the $700M was absolutely needed to prevent a financial disaster. It didn’t help, in fact, we don’t even know where the first $350 went. Have we seen a financial disaster yet? Nope. We were sold crap sandwiches for bailing out Fannie/Freddie, AIG, Bear Stearns, the big three auto makers, et al. Our government, a government supposedly of the people, by the people and for the people, is throwing our money away and refusing to listen to our voices. And if you think the current $900B (closer to $1.4T after interest) will be the last request, think again. There are already talks about TARP II, Electric Boogaloo. And how much more will Congress beg for when this magnificent crap sandwich fails? This, my friends, is just the tip of the iceberg, and sadly, not even Al Gore’s Man-Made Global Warming can’t melt this chunk of ice.

But back to my initial question. If my family of four received $17,000 I would pay off credit cards and buy a new couch set that my wife has had to repeatedly put off buying to other more pressing needs. That means some of my money would go to banks, and some money would go to a furniture store. I might use part of it as a down payment on a new vehicle to replace our aging van.

I think many people are in the same boat. If we had this money we would not “hoard” it as many liberals think. Most people don’t have the financial freedom to hoard anything right now. If the economy is as bad as politicians and the press say it is, then people need this money to handle immediate expenses. Yesterday President Obama said something along the lines of “We are not rushing to try and ram this down peoples throats. We are rushing because we are told that if we don’t it will lead to certain financial disaster.” My burning question: who are these we people? Are they the same bankers that are hoarding the $350M they have already received? Are they the same financial institutions handing out millions in bonuses? President Obama, I implore you to share with us exactly who is telling you this and exactly what will happen if we don’t act. Stop the scare tactics and give us the facts. The American people are smarter thank you may think.

What would you do with $4290 per person in your home?

Tagged with: