How Big Is A Trillion?

On June 22, 2009, in Politics, by TheLoudTalker

Thanks to the visual imagery of Josh Dyess at WallStats.com I am happy to help educate the masses. Josh has a creative eye and can help you get a better understanding of complex (and not so complex) stuff via pictures. Check out his site when you have a moment. [update: Josh tells me he didn't create these images, he got it from a friend, who got it from a friend, etc. So, I don't know who actually created them. But still visit Josh's site, its pretty cool.]

So, how big is a trillion?

Tagged with:
 

Graphic: Visualizing Obama Debt

On June 18, 2009, in Politics, by TheLoudTalker

God bless Twitter for helping me find this graphic by Cory Doctorow at BoingBoing. As he says, when you start talking about our budget in trillions, people fail to comprehend the sizes we are talking about. Pictures help people like me put the current administration’s drunken spending into a proper frame of reference. At this point I don’t give a crap how much Bush spent… Obama has taken spending to an entirely new level, one that we as a country CANNOT sustain. If Barack-O inherited a single crap sandwich from Bush (a common lefty claim), Barack is currently preparing a fecal cruise ship buffet for the Republican president that WILL be elected in 2012. (more credit due here and here.)

Tagged with:
 

Who Inherited What?

On March 25, 2009, in Politics, by TheLoudTalker

President Obama, cut the crap with the inheritance comments. You won the election, as you are fond of telling your opponents. Stop lying to America and deal with reality please. Did Bush spend like a football pro at a topless bar? Yes he did. But Barack-O is making Bush look frugal by comparison. Some perspective:

The Federal Budget

Notice anything? For starters, President Bush decreased the budget every year starting in 2004,with the exception of 2008. Why the exception? A $300B tax credit has a way of skewing your averages. The budget in 2008 was $450B, not the $1.3T that Obama keeps referring to. The 2009 budget is the same as the 2008 budget because Bush never signed the budget as Wicked Witch Pelosi wasn’t worth the signature. Bush was pushing to have the budget balanced by 2010. And, given the trend starting in 2004 you can see that we were heading in that direction.

Enter Barack-O.

The majority of the 2009 budget shown above is the $700B TARP crap signed by President Obama, not President Bush. But wait, there’s more. The president does not allocate funds to the federal government (thanks Ed); Congress does. And who controlled Congress in 2007-2008? Last year Democrats pushed resolutions through that ended up in the omnibus spending bill that Barack-O signed earlier this month.

As to the positive sounding claim from the president and vice president of “cutting the budget in half in five years.” maybe they can. But look at the pretty picture above. When you cut the $1.85T you start with in2009 your goal is $900B by 2013. That’s twice the amount of the last Bush budget. It’s easy to cut something when you start by quadrupling it first and then claim savings later on.

I don’t remember any president in my adult life that has whined and complained so often about the problems of his predecessor. Obama is so focused on campaigning for higher office that he apparently doesn’t realize that he’s reached the pinnacle of higher offices in America. Barack-O, please stop campaigning. Try appointing some people to your damned Treasury Department (you’ve filled one of the 18 seats…)

The press is silent, as usual, worshipping at the altar of Barack-O. The lemmings will continue to believe that he inhereted everything bad in the world from the evil Bush Monster. And unless conservatives do something about this we will all be screwed again in four years. Spread the truth. Get loud.

Tagged with:
 

What would you do with $4290?

On February 6, 2009, in Economy, by TheLoudTalker
America's Financial Iceberg

America's Financial Iceberg

As Kevin McCullough noted today, “if we took the projected size of the stimulus at $1,300,000,000,000, and divided by the population at present time – individuals would get back roughly $4290 per person and the average family of four would get back a little more than $17,000.”

I think the concept of a stimulus package is a farce. Congress tried to scare us into supporting the TARP saying that the $700M was absolutely needed to prevent a financial disaster. It didn’t help, in fact, we don’t even know where the first $350 went. Have we seen a financial disaster yet? Nope. We were sold crap sandwiches for bailing out Fannie/Freddie, AIG, Bear Stearns, the big three auto makers, et al. Our government, a government supposedly of the people, by the people and for the people, is throwing our money away and refusing to listen to our voices. And if you think the current $900B (closer to $1.4T after interest) will be the last request, think again. There are already talks about TARP II, Electric Boogaloo. And how much more will Congress beg for when this magnificent crap sandwich fails? This, my friends, is just the tip of the iceberg, and sadly, not even Al Gore’s Man-Made Global Warming can’t melt this chunk of ice.

But back to my initial question. If my family of four received $17,000 I would pay off credit cards and buy a new couch set that my wife has had to repeatedly put off buying to other more pressing needs. That means some of my money would go to banks, and some money would go to a furniture store. I might use part of it as a down payment on a new vehicle to replace our aging van.

I think many people are in the same boat. If we had this money we would not “hoard” it as many liberals think. Most people don’t have the financial freedom to hoard anything right now. If the economy is as bad as politicians and the press say it is, then people need this money to handle immediate expenses. Yesterday President Obama said something along the lines of “We are not rushing to try and ram this down peoples throats. We are rushing because we are told that if we don’t it will lead to certain financial disaster.” My burning question: who are these we people? Are they the same bankers that are hoarding the $350M they have already received? Are they the same financial institutions handing out millions in bonuses? President Obama, I implore you to share with us exactly who is telling you this and exactly what will happen if we don’t act. Stop the scare tactics and give us the facts. The American people are smarter thank you may think.

What would you do with $4290 per person in your home?

Tagged with:
 

TWO TRILLION DOLLARS???

On January 13, 2009, in Politics, by TheLoudTalker

According to this US News article,  Liberal writer Robert Kutner thinks that President Obama me be thinking too small. Kuttner wants Congress to authorize $2 TRILLION in spending.

Kuttner is the co-founder and current co-editor of liberal magazine The American Prospect (self-described as “an authoritative magazine of liberal ideas”). For 20 years he wrote for Business Week and now columns in The Boston Globe. He has appeared as a liberal voice on NPR, The News Hour with Jim Lehrer, Firing Line, Crossfire, and NOW on PBS. Here’s what he proposes, along with my feedback:

  1. Aid to state/local governments avoid layoffs or cuts in services]. Cost: $200B
    This seems innocent enough, except for the fact that government does not know how to control spending in the first place. Why give it more to play with?
  2. Emergency revenue sharing to states/cities by picking up half of the state share of Medicaid. Cost: $100B
    This is a drop in the bucket. Medicaid/Medicare/Social Security are a potential $13-52 Trillion disaster waiting to happen. The actual number varies depending on who you ask. Either way, it’s HUGE.
  3. Temporarily pay COBRA coverage for laid off people who lose their health insurance, and allow people over age 55 to buy into Medicare. Cost: $100 billion.
    What? Where in our Constitution does the right to health care appear? I lost my job in 2003 and had to go without insurance for 9 months because I couldn’t afford the $1100 a month cost. I had a 3yr-old and a 5-month old at the time and we toughed it out. America can do the same today.
  4. Expand Unemployment Insurance to cover part time workers, extend eligibility period, and increase benefit levels. Cost: $50 billion.
    Unemployment insurance is supposed to be temporary coverage. Too many Americans rely on it already; raising the benefit would not motivate the proper behavior, which is to get OFF of unemployment.
  5. Roll back tuition at state universities and community colleges, and increase Pell Grants–contingent on universities not increasing costs to students. Cost: $100 billion.
    Hell no. College is not a right either. In fact, not every students goes to college. There are plenty of other jobs out there that do not require a college degree. They are called trades. Tuition goes up every year, I’ve got two degrees to prove it. If you can’t afford college you go part time. If you still can’t afford it you get a job and save money. And the Pell Grant thing is a crock. Despite my parent’s very modest income in the 1980s I never qualified for these grant. Yet, richer kids that had parents that knew how to hide money got them. Screw that.
  6. Declare a temporary holiday on the worker share of the Social Security tax, and have government make up the loss to the trust fund, Cost: $450 billion.
    I’ve got a better idea. Declare an Income Tax Holiday. Let us keep our money.
  7. Continue many of these relief programs into a second year, as economic conditions warrant. Cost: $500 billion.
    No. Doing stupid things multiple times is stupid. If it was wrong the first year, it will be wrong the second year.
  8. Use direct federal lending to refinance distressed mortgages, and as necessary reduce the outstanding principal amount. This can begin by mid-2009. Cost: $200 billion of subsidy; most additional debt is eventually repaid.
    HELL NO! I still have yet to see a single instance of predatory lending. The vast majority of these failing mortgages are homes owned by people that made bad decisions, got greedy, or both. I could have bought a $500k house, but I went for half that price because I understand basic math.
  9. Begin planning immediately for a broad range of infrastructure programs, from traditional outlay on roads, bridges and mass transit to spending on 21st century infrastructure such as retrofitting homes, green energy, universal broadband, and smart-grid electricity systems. Spend money on worker training as necessary. Cost: $300 billion.
    Can you say “bridge to nowhere?” Green energy is a good concept, but plan with reason and logic. That bright, yellow ball in the sky is what makes the Earth hot. No matter what we do humans will have virtually zero effect on our planet’s temperature. Universal Broadband? Are you kidding me? Why not free ice cream for every home, or a motorcycle for every man or woman that wants one? What about a pony? Or a fire truck? Smart-grid systems? Sure, that sounds reasonable. Employee training? Definitely, but let the companies train their employees, and help them by lowering corporate taxes so that they can actually pay for education initiatives.

Mr. Kuttner, I recognize your desire to make America better. But outrageous spending is not the way to go about this. I prefer  reducing the size of the government and letting citizens and businesses keep more of the money that they have earned. Motivate those that aren’t working by making it more painful to remain unemployed. Yes, more painful. We all have our limits, but when it makes better sense to stay home and receive a check instead of working at McDonalds, Wal-Mart or washing dishes somewhere, we’ve got a problem. Too many of those that recieve entitlement do nothing to improve their lives. This needs to change.

Tagged with: